The data about police shootings just didn't add up, but no one at Thomson Reuters wanted to hear it.
Saw your TCT interview in March, hope your story gets wider distribution as it is such an important one to tell.
Dear Zac, Thank you for your courage. I have friends at Reuters that write about right wing conspiracy theorists in Reuters articles. When I present them with facts about left wing conspiracies like Russiagate and ask why they don't cover them or use the same wording and framing they go silent.
I’m retired but I know for a fact I’d be fired too because my entire career required me to ensure written reports were supported by facts. I’d be unnecessary today.
reuters is a shithole really. I get their "news" without subscribing and I only take a look to see what the commies are up to now.
White Privilege is an unscientific concept
We should expect the racial ratio of armed suspects killed to correlate to the racial ratio of cop killers. Why would would there be any correlation with unarmed suspects killed?
either you must show that unarmed suspects are killing cops, or cite the percentage of unarmed suspects killed when the office mistook the suspect for having a weapon. Without that your argument is weak.
You could make the the broader point that the racial ratio of all police interactions should correlate to the number of unarmed suspects killed, but this may be a result of profiling blacks.
You really need data on racial ratio of actual crime committed and the number and nature of police interactions. It's very complicated and you need much more data to make any kind of argument.
Zac, would love to interview you on “The Intellectuals” at STARRS.us. We are striving to eliminate CRT in the military. Respond to email@example.com. MP
Keep speaking the truth. Get yourself on the JRE, the timcast IRL show and on Russel Brands show. This is so you danger your story out to millions of people.